Canada’s Ultra-Low Fertility Rate: The Question No One in Ottawa Will Ask

Canada has crossed a demographic line that should alarm every policymaker, physician and parent in the country.

According to newly released data from Statistics Canada, Canada’s total fertility rate (TFR) fell to 1.25 children per woman in 2024, placing the country in the category of “ultra-low fertility.”

Government and media coverage have rushed to explain this collapse through familiar narratives: delayed motherhood, education, careers, changing social norms, and contraception. But these explanations deliberately ignore the most significant biological disruption to reproductive-age Canadians in generations — the mass rollout of COVID-19 vaccines beginning in 2021.

For families watching their communities shrink, for young women facing unexplained cycle changes, and for couples struggling to conceive after 2021, this omission is not accidental. It is the story that cannot be told.

Canada’s fertility decline began around 2009, but what stands out now is how sharply and persistently fertility has fallen since the COVID era, even as economic conditions stabilized and immigration increased.

In 2024:

• Canada recorded its lowest fertility rate ever

• The average age of first-time mothers rose to 31.8 years

• More than half of Canadian-born women aged 20–49 had no children

• Many women surveyed still wanted children — but had not had them

These are not just “lifestyle choices.” Biology still matters. And population-wide biological signals do not change overnight without a population-wide exposure.

Since 2021, women around the world have reported:

• Menstrual cycle disruption

• Missed or heavier periods

• Ovarian and hormonal irregularities

• Early pregnancy loss

• Difficulty conceiving after vaccination

Peer-reviewed studies and pharmacovigilance databases have documented reproductive and menstrual effects following COVID vaccination, particularly among women of childbearing age. Yet Canadian public health agencies have consistently dismissed these reports as “temporary” or “anecdotal,” even as fertility rates continue to fall.

Statistics Canada’s own survey reveals a troubling contradiction:
Most women without children say they want to become mothers.
The desire remains — the outcomes do not.

Nowhere in Statistics Canada’s analysis is there any discussion of:

• COVID vaccination status

• Timing of fertility decline relative to vaccine rollout

• Reproductive adverse-event reporting

• Long-term impacts on ovarian or reproductive health

This silence is striking, particularly given Health Canada’s reliance on short-term clinical trials that explicitly excluded pregnant women and lacked long-term fertility follow-up.

When the largest medical intervention in Canadian history coincides with the lowest fertility rate in Canadian history, refusing to examine the connection is not science — it is policy protection.

Canada is not alone. Countries with aggressive COVID vaccination campaigns now cluster in the same ultra-low fertility category, including:

• Japan

• Italy

• Finland

• Switzerland

• South Korea

• Singapore

Different cultures. Different economies. Same biological outcome.

Concerns about fertility decline are now being raised publicly by physicians, researchers, and authors internationally. Recent warnings shared by Dr. Drew and Naomi Wolf, underscores growing concern that declining fertility is being treated as a sociological issue while potential biological drivers remain largely off-limits for investigation.

Concerns about fertility decline also cannot be separated from long-standing elite conversations about population control. In a widely cited TED Talk, Bill Gates stated:

“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”

Canadians were assured COVID vaccines were about health — not demographics. But when fertility collapses after a global vaccination campaign, those past statements deserve renewed scrutiny.

Environmental exposures also burden reproductive systems. Research on widely used herbicides like glyphosate finds links between low-level exposure and reduced sperm count, hormonal disruption and impaired reproductive tissues — even at regulatory “safe” levels. These environmental stressors, like biological exposures, deserve transparent evaluation in any honest account of declining fertility trends.

Beyond glyphosate, new scientific testing has identified more than 50 common chemicals with hormone-disrupting activity that may be linked to infertility. These substances are found in everyday products including plastics, pesticides, personal care items, food packaging, flame retardants, and household dust. Researchers warn that current regulatory frameworks evaluate chemicals in isolation and fail to account for cumulative, real-world exposures — even though endocrine disruption is a well-established pathway for impaired fertility, disrupted menstrual cycles, reduced sperm quality, and compromised reproductive outcomes.

Taken together, these biological stressors point to regulatory capture — not coincidence.

Health Canada continues to frame Canada’s fertility collapse as a matter of personal choice and social trends while systematically refusing to examine cumulative biological exposures that fall squarely under its legal mandate to regulate. COVID vaccine safety signals involving menstrual disruption, miscarriage and stillbirths have been minimized or excluded from fertility analysis. At the same time, mounting evidence linking endocrine-disrupting chemicals — including glyphosate and dozens of other common substances — to infertility is treated as a theoretical concern rather than an urgent public-health threat.

Access-to-information delays, reliance on industry-submitted data, and the absence of robust post-market safety studies reveal a regulator that no longer functions as an independent protector of public health. This is not a failure of evidence. It is a failure of governance — a system that protects institutions and commercial interests first, while Canadians absorb the biological cost.

Fertility decline is not an abstract statistic. It is:

• Empty classrooms

• Families that never form

• Grief that goes unacknowledged

• A generation of women told “it’s just stress”

True public health would demand transparent investigation, open data and honest risk acknowledgment — not denial.

Canada’s fertility collapse is not just a social story. It is a biological alarm bell. And until COVID vaccines are fully and independently examined as part of this picture, Canadians are being denied the truth about their reproductive future.

Sources:

Statistics Canada, Survey on Family Transitions (2024)

Statistics Canada, Daily – Fertility Indicators, 2024

CTV News, Canada is among countries with an ‘ultra-low fertility’ rate. What is behind the drop?

******************************************************************************************************

Thank you for being a Defender of truth, freedom and children’s health!  If you find value in the work we do at CHD Canada, please consider making a donation.