U.S. Doctors Sue CDC Over Untested 72-Dose Vaccine Schedule

A groundbreaking lawsuit has been filed in the United States, targeting the CDC’s failure to test the safety of its full childhood vaccine schedule — now more than 72 doses strong.

Dr. Paul Thomas, Dr. Kenneth Stoller, and the advocacy group Stand for Health Freedom are leading the challenge, calling the CDC’s schedule an untested experiment on children that has grown unchecked for decades. The lawsuit names Susan Monarez, Ph.D., director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Doctors Punished for Telling the Truth

Both physicians bringing the suit know first-hand what happens when doctors question the CDC’s authority.

• Dr. Paul Thomas published peer-reviewed research comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children. His findings showed higher rates of asthma, allergies, and ADHD among the vaccinated — and within days, his medical license was suspended.

• Dr. Kenneth Stoller used genetic testing to identify children at greater risk of vaccine injury. For refusing to follow CDC’s rigid rules, California revoked his license.

These cases illustrate what the plaintiffs describe as a system built not on science, but on coercion and censorship — one that strips parents of informed consent and silences doctors who put patients first.

Warnings Ignored, Chronic Illness Soars

For over 20 years, the CDC’s own advisors — including the Institute of Medicine — urged the agency to study the cumulative effects of the vaccine schedule. Those calls went unanswered.

In the same period, the childhood vaccine schedule ballooned from 24 to 72+ doses. At the same time, chronic illness in children skyrocketed. Autism rates rose from 1 in 150 to 1 in 31, and more than half of U.S. children now suffer at least one chronic disease.

The lawsuit calls this “deliberate ignorance” — a refusal to investigate harm that might undermine confidence in the program.

What the Lawsuit Demands

Attorney Rick Jaffe, who represents the plaintiffs, said the lawsuit “goes to the heart of the CDC’s childhood immunization program.”  The lawsuit will be “100% funded by the community” through an online crowdfunding campaign.

The plaintiffs are asking the court to intervene and force accountability. Specifically, they seek to:

• End the CDC’s “Category A” framework that makes nearly every vaccine a default requirement.

• Compel transparent studies comparing fully vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

• Reinstate medical freedom and shared decision-making between families and doctors.

• Declare the current CDC framework unconstitutional and arbitrary.

“Our children are being used in the largest untested medical experiment in history,” said Leah Wilson, co-founder of Stand for Health Freedom.

Why Canada Should Care

While this case is U.S.-based, the implications are broader. Canadian public health authorities and provincial governments often follow CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics guidance when shaping vaccine policies.

A victory in this lawsuit will pave the way for greater transparency, accountability and medical freedom on both sides of the border.

For families and physicians who have long questioned the safety of the ever-expanding schedule, this case represents an important step forward — one that finally brings long-ignored concerns into the courtroom, where answers can no longer be avoided.

Source: The Defender

***********************************************************************************************************

Thank you for being a Defender of truth, freedom and children’s health!  If you find value in the work we do at CHD Canada, please consider making a donation.